Investigative journalist David Hundeyin has stirred strong reactions online after rejecting comparisons to Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra who was sentenced to life in prison on November 20, 2025.
In a post on X, Hundeyin said he should not be compared to Kanu. He described Kanu as “a separatist funded by a foreign government” and claimed that Kanu received support while living in Israel. He also mentioned the long history of interaction between some Biafran supporters and Israel. There is no confirmed public evidence of direct financial support, but his claim has created a new round of national debate.
Kanu’s conviction followed charges that included ordering violent actions and delivering broadcasts that the government described as dangerous. Many of his supporters still believe he is being punished for political reasons. Others say his sentence reflects the damage caused during years of agitation.
Hundeyin said he and Kanu have nothing in common. While Kanu focused on secession, Hundeyin said he is committed to exposing corruption and defending national interest. His remarks have led to mixed reactions online. Some people have asked him to provide evidence for the claim about Israel while others praised him for speaking openly.
The situation has added more tension to discussions about Nigeria’s unity, activism and the limits of political expression. Kanu is expected to appeal his sentence, and Hundeyin’s comment has now become part of the wider public argument.