The Obidient Movement, a support base linked to former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi, has rejected claims that it is promoting divisive rhetoric within the coalition-backed African Democratic Congress (ADC), saying the accusations reflect fear of accountability among political leaders.
The group was responding to comments by the ADC spokesperson, Bolaji Abdullahi, during a live audio conversation on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter. Abdullahi cautioned Obi’s supporters, popularly called Obidients, against what he described as divisive messaging ahead of the party’s June primaries.
During the conversation, Abdullahi criticised the “Peter Obi or nothing” slogan, arguing that it could narrow the coalition’s appeal. He said those using such messaging “preach division, limit outreach and harden positions needed for victory across regions and supporters.”
His remarks triggered a strong backlash from Obidients on X, with many accusing the ADC leadership of pushing a narrative aimed at weakening their influence within the coalition. The public dispute has also fuelled confusion over the coalition’s internal messaging and expectations for partners as the primary season approaches.
In a statement issued on Monday, 26 January 2026, the Obidient Movement said calling the group “divisive” misrepresents why it formed and what it stands for. The statement was titled, “Calling Obidients ‘Divisive’ Is What Politicians Do When They Fear Accountability.”
According to the movement, it did not grow out of extremism or intolerance. It said it emerged from years of poor governance, rising poverty, weakening institutions, and a political culture that repeatedly shut ordinary Nigerians out of decision-making.
The group said millions of Nigerians, especially young people, became politically active not to divide the country, but because they were tired of recycled leadership and unfulfilled promises.
On its role within the ADC coalition, the movement argued that coalition politics should allow open debate rather than demand silence. It said coalitions are meant to bring together ideas, build alternatives, and encourage scrutiny, adding that participation should not be mistaken for blind loyalty.
The statement warned that any coalition that treats questioning voices as a threat may not be ready to govern a diverse and complex country like Nigeria.
The movement also defended the passion of its supporters, saying vocal engagement is common in reform movements and should not be framed as a danger to national unity.
It rejected portrayals of Obidients as a rigid bloc, describing members as Nigerians from different regions, professions, and faiths who share demands for transparency, competence, and accountable leadership.
The Obidient Movement further dismissed suggestions that outspoken supporters could damage the coalition’s electoral chances, insisting that elections are decided by organisation, alliances, credibility, and leadership, not by efforts to silence engaged citizens.